FALL ISSUE--The Christmas Truce of 1914

Order copies of the FALL ISSUE now .
Donate to the project.
Links to the current issue and all past print issues below right.

Thursday, September 18, 2014

Bombing for Peace is like...



Perched on the precipice of another war, has anyone noticed that the more we bomb, the more enemies we have? 

American drone strikes have been the best recruiting tool for jihadists. 

by Dennis DuVall


    Remember Al-Qaeda?  After more than 455 drone attacks by President Obama in Pakistan and Yemen since 2009, killing 1,300-2,300 militants according to a January 2014 report from the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ), we now face the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and an assortment of Al-Qaeda-affiliated terror groups, including Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) in Yemen, Al-Nusra in Syria, Al-Shabaab in Somalia, Boko Haram in Nigeria, Ansar Al-Sharia in Libya, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb in the Sahara, Jamaah Islamiyah in Indonesia, and Abu Sayyaf in the Philippines. Not to mention Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, and the Taliban, still on its feet after ten years resisting the American occupation of Afghanistan and surviving 1,015 drone strikes killing over 2,300 Taliban fighters.

     According to Gregory Johnson, author of The Last Refuge, AQAP in Yemen numbered 300-400 fighters in 2009. During President Obama’s five years in office, TBIJ reported between 65 and 77 drone attacks against AQAP killing 600 to 900 militants. In an interview on September 11, Johnson told NPR that today AQAP counts three or four times as many fighters as in 2009. As anti-drone activists warned back in 2009, “Drone attacks do not eliminate or prevent terrorism, but rather incite more anger and hatred, violence, retaliation, and revenge attacks.” By now we should wonder why U.S. air attacks remain the preferred option to combat terrorism when American drone strikes have been the best recruiting tool for jihadists.

     We need not join in media fear-mongering, endless demonizing of ISIS, or comparing ISIS to the worst horrors of the Nazis. A more appropriate comparison of ISIS might be made to America’s drone war. Is a beheading more savage or more barbaric than a child being blown apart by a Hellfire missile?  Video executions of American journalists were horrible enough to watch, but why don’t we ever see video images of victims of a U.S. drone strike?

      Pakistani journalist Safdar Darwar described the victims of a drone attack to Kathy Kelly and Josh Brollier of Voices for Creative Nonviolence in 2010:


Their bodies, carbonized, were fully burned. They could only be identified by their legs and hands. One body was still on fire when he reached there. Then he learned that the charred and mutilated corpses were relatives of his who lived in his village, two men and a boy aged seven or eight.They couldn’t pick up the charred parts in one piece.
                                    “Drones and Democracy,” Common Dreams, May 18, 2010

     As Americans, we would do well to examine the values that justify assassination and the killing of innocent women and children in America’s drone war that has claimed 500 to 1,000 civilian casualties, according to TBIJ’s 2014 report. Costofwar.org counts at least 21,000 civilians killed in Afghanistan.

How is it that Americans are appalled by the graphic execution of James Foley, but pay little notice that American-made bombs blew up 511 children in Gaza? How is it that Americans are sickened by the video killing of Steven Sotloff but are indifferent to 200 children dismembered and incinerated by missiles launched from American drones in Pakistan and Yemen?

     Anti-western hatred now manifested by ISIS is the logical outcome of the McCain Doctrine, that Washington bombs and bullets are the answer to violent ideologies that spurn American values.  Revulsion to the graphic images of beheadings has galvanized public support for air strikes against ISIS and pushed President Obama toward a major military intervention in Syria.  But this is a war the McCain Doctrine cannot win because, if anyone is paying attention, the more we bomb, the more enemies we will have.
 
Dennis DuVall is a member of Veterans For Peace and has lived in Prescott, Arizona, for 15 years.



Thursday, September 11, 2014

The Shovel, Syria, and the Vietnam War


Photograph by Mike Hastie: Vietnam Veterans Memorial Portland, Oregon. One of six black granite walls with the names of 803 Oregonians killed in the Vietnam War.

You bury the past, so you can repeat the past.
That is the very nature of Empire.
Whenever the truth threatens one's belief system,
there is an urgent instinct to deny its reality.
Therefore, the shovel becomes the most significant
instrument in concealing the lies of history.
If allegiance and obedience knew the truth,
they would have panic attacks.

Mike Hastie
Army Medic Vietnam
September 11, 2014


"We have laws against corruption preciously so we can get away with it. Corruption is our protection. Corruption is why we win."
                               -- dialogue from the film: Syriana

 

Guidelines for submissions to WCT

The ideal article for the quarterly print version of The War Crimes Times: 600 to 1200 crisply-written words on a topic relevant to our mission.

We also welcome high resolution photos, cartoons, poetry, and letters to the editor.

Third party material will be considered only with the express permission of the copyright holder.

The WCT editorial team will consider all submissions. If your submission is selected for publication, we will notify you. If your submission is rejected, please do not be discouraged. Many criteria — such as timeliness, style, freshness, relevance to the WCT mission or the particular issue's theme, and content of recent issues — are used to determine WCT content.

Submissions are due no later than the 1st of the month that the paper is printed: March, June, September, and December. EARLY SUBMISSIONS HAVE A BETTER CHANCE OF BEING CONSIDERED.

Send, in electronic format (preferred), to editor@WarCrimesTimes.org or to Editor, WCT/VFP, PO Box 10664, Greensboro, NC 27404. (Note: due to size constraints, all submissions may not be used in the print edition, but all will be considered for posting on this blog.)



War Crimes Times Statement of Purpose (revised 06/2011)


The War Crimes Times provides compelling, ongoing information on war and the war crimes that invariably accompany war, the many costs of war, the effects of our war culture on our national character and international reputation, and the need to hold accountable those who initiate and conduct illegal wars. Additionally and importantly, we also report on the efforts of the many people who sacrifice their time, money, and comfort to work for peace.


When national leaders initiate hostilities they create the conditions—the extreme use of force coupled with limited accountability—for the war crimes which invariably follow. War crimes are therefore an inherent part of war. The suffering caused and the enmity aroused by war crimes must be regarded as costs of war. Since these and other costs far exceed any benefits of war, we seek to end war as a tool of international policy.


Towards this goal, we believe that holding war criminals accountable will send a strong message to all current and future heads of state to very carefully weigh all the consequences of the decision to go to war. While we recognize that United States has long relied on unlawful military force to further its foreign policy goals, we are particularly concerned with the blatant and egregious violations of international law committed by the United States beginning with the Administration of George W. Bush and now continued and expanded under President Obama.


We endorse any efforts, including impeachment, which would bring war criminals of any administration to justice. The War Crimes Times has resolved to see that Bush, Cheney, Obama, and other government officials and military officers who have committed war crimes are prosecuted—no matter how long it takes.


There is no statute of limitations on war crimes.